Originally Posted by joeri888
Fully agree with you. Murray probably is better than Laver, but not than Federer at his best.
Murray>Laver??? I don't care how much "evolution" is argued...one guy won 2 CYGS's and the other hasn't won a SET in major finals. Tennis is and has always been about showing up in big moments. One did, the other hasn't.
"I am also like Federer, but with a better backhand."...sureshs
Federer: "I am like sureshs, but my San Diego 4.0 NTRP backhand is weaker"???