Originally Posted by monfed
Well, Nadal not playing well(I thought he was decent btw) when conditions were heavily in his favour is not really excusable. Fed was good in patches too if you look at how the scorecard fluctuated, the pattern was similar to their recent matches(except the WTF where Fed outplays him) only this time Fed came out on top. Credit to Federer for playing better in the clutch(Eg - the 15-30 point and a clutch MP ace AFTER a rain break.)
Really? You think Nadal was "decent" having hit,iirc,2 fh winners through nearly 2 sets of tennis? Come on,Monfed. Fed won fair and square,but Nadal should have stayed home with how awful he was.