Originally Posted by Nathaniel_Near
16 >> 14 is a lame argument. What really puts Roger ahead of Pete is his Roland Garros title and his period of rarely paralleled dominance.
16 and 14 are virtually the same if you just look at numbers.
agree to an extent, 16 > 14 is only a part of the argument. What is more striking is the difference in surface versatility and dominance , both areas in which federer edges out sampras by a huge margin .....