Originally Posted by Nathaniel_Near
16 >> 14 is a lame argument. What really puts Roger ahead of Pete is his Roland Garros title and his period of rarely paralleled dominance.
16 and 14 are virtually the same if you just look at numbers.
No it's not !
Thereís a lesson here for every tennis umpire: donít upset Rafael Nadal.
Especially if his shorts are on backward.