Originally Posted by fed_rulz
no, it's not. your stroke by stroke comparisons are a product of your subjectivity; look at the results, and you'll get an objective view. Compared to Sampras, Federer has more majors, masters, more titles on grass, clay and hard, more finals, SFs, much more dominant, and according to you, it is close? are you kidding me? you should be embarrassed by your own posts, not of your fellow *******s'.
sampras should consider himself lucky that he gets mentioned in the same breath as Federer.
If you do not think they are close, then you are the one who is not being objective. The Tennis Channel countdown, while flawed, had Sampras in the top 5 of the men of all time. How is that not close? If you don't think Sampras' serve was better than Roger's (and Roger's is very good) then you clearly do not know much about tennis.