Originally Posted by tennis_pro
The only reason Ivanisevic won Wimbledon in 2001 was because Federer took out Sampras in the 4th round. I would love to know who would beat Sampras at Wimbledon in 2001 and take the title, as sure as hell not Ivanisevic who had a mental block and choked a lot of the time against the American.
Even Pete himself said that he was playing good enough to win the title, he was serving nothing worse than in the previous editions, Federer just kept himself in the match and didn't choke in the end like Ivanisevic.
Btw LOOOL at Roddick being the "heavy favorite" to beat Ivanisevic at Wimbledon in 2001. Where did you got that info from? Your a**?
Pete playing good enough at wimbledon that year? He almost went out to some bum in an earlier round.. Doubt Pete was going to win it that year. His grass game clearly hit a dead end by 2001