Quote:
Originally Posted by DRII
No, because they have not won a slam...
and again your only focussing on one aspect and avoiding the others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlinpinpin
And so, Murray is one, too, isn't he? And Nalbandian?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRII
Actually it does work and does hold water. Not that this arbitrary exercise you all are attempting really means anything.
Sampras was a contender to win the French (even if it was only for one year), so therefore he qualifies as an open era great under my original definition...
|
|
|
WHAT??
Sampras made one semi and he's a contender. However David made the semi twice and Murray made one semi losing to the clay goat(Nadal) are not a contender???
You're a joke...I suggest you quit while you're behind because you'll continue to embarrass yourself.