View Single Post
Old 06-04-2012, 11:09 AM   #241
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 15,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRII View Post
Now you're just being stupid...

and you know it.

Don't fall to the level of TMF, mandy, ambk etc...


There is no new rule. I said that IMO to be an open era great a player has to be a multiple slam winner and contender to win or have won slams on every slam surface...

Its pretty simple, i don't understand the confusion...
maybe because you keep adding new stuff to your criteria when someone proves you wrong?

btw cant you answer simple questions? If Sampras was a contender at the French Open, why not Davydenko, Murray, Nalbandian? Not sure about Murray but Davydenko and Nalbandian seem to look like bigger threats on clay than Sampras
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote