View Single Post
Old 06-04-2012, 11:09 AM   #241
tennis_pro's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 16,489

Originally Posted by DRII View Post
Now you're just being stupid...

and you know it.

Don't fall to the level of TMF, mandy, ambk etc...

There is no new rule. I said that IMO to be an open era great a player has to be a multiple slam winner and contender to win or have won slams on every slam surface...

Its pretty simple, i don't understand the confusion...
maybe because you keep adding new stuff to your criteria when someone proves you wrong?

btw cant you answer simple questions? If Sampras was a contender at the French Open, why not Davydenko, Murray, Nalbandian? Not sure about Murray but Davydenko and Nalbandian seem to look like bigger threats on clay than Sampras
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote