View Single Post
Old 06-04-2012, 11:21 AM   #245
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,278

Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
maybe because you keep adding new stuff to your criteria when someone proves you wrong?

btw cant you answer simple questions? If Sampras was a contender at the French Open, why not Davydenko, Murray, Nalbandian? Not sure about Murray but Davydenko and Nalbandian seem to look like bigger threats on clay than Sampras
Like i said (I don't know why i have to keep repeating myself)

A semifinalist is a contender to win a slam (IMO) of whatever particular year.

So therefore if Davey or Nalby or Murray or whomever made it to the semis; they were contenders!

If you disagree then fine, but do not try and miscontrue my words...
DRII is offline   Reply With Quote