Originally Posted by tennis_pro
maybe because you keep adding new stuff to your criteria when someone proves you wrong?
btw cant you answer simple questions? If Sampras was a contender at the French Open, why not Davydenko, Murray, Nalbandian? Not sure about Murray but Davydenko and Nalbandian seem to look like bigger threats on clay than Sampras
Like i said (I don't know why i have to keep repeating myself)
A semifinalist is a contender to win a slam (IMO) of whatever particular year.
So therefore if Davey or Nalby or Murray or whomever made it to the semis; they were contenders!
If you disagree then fine, but do not try and miscontrue my words...