Originally Posted by JeMar
I find a little ironic that Murray brought in Lendl to win WIMBLEDON.
Not for me. Probably no one player in the history of the game has put more thought and effort into winning that tournament than Lendl. If I recall, he even missed a FO one year to prepare early. He changed his game to volley more, etc. Its actually odd he could not win it considering that he was not a bad volleyer, had a big serve and moved well. I think the problem was that he played in an era with great natural volleyers and the grass was very fast.
However, its a much slower and different game now and I think I see more S&V at RG than Wimbledon.