Ranking discepancies easily resolved
When people feel that end of year rankings have got it wrong, it usually when do a comparison on how players did at the slams and perhaps the season end finals. The issue I fee could be resolved by making the slams relatively more point laden. I feel the slams should be 3 times the ranking value of masters 1000s.
Imagine if someone won cincinati and montreal one year should they feel as satisfied as someone winning wimbledon?