Originally Posted by ZeroSkid
6. Federer(why so low?, because he won slams in a weak field)
Federer won slams 2003 to 2010 and 2012. Nadal was in the top 3 for seven (7) of the years when Federer won a grand slam. And since Nadal has been near the top, Federer has won 13 slams. If those 13 are worth so few, than how little must Nadal's 11 in that same time be worth? Fail.
I'd put Nadal slightly below Sampras, so 4th probably. Still could catch up to Sampras's slam count, though, if he keeps staying healthy for the clay season, where most of his points come.