View Single Post
Old 07-28-2012, 05:00 PM   #46
BobbyOne
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,494
Default

Dan Lobb,

I don't want to annoy you. I would like to not calling you stubborn but you don't make it easy for me to not calling you so.

You seem to have a trauma with Wembley and a visionary view on Kooyong as a major event.

Wembley had always a strong field even in the end-1950s. 1957: Gonzalez, Rosewall, Segura and Hoad. 1958: Gonzalez, Segura, Rosewall, Trabert, Sedgman; Hoad was in the draw but was defaulted due to injury. A weak field???
1959: Hoad, Segura, Trabert, Rosewall, Sedgman, Anderson, Cooper. A weak field??? I concede that Forest Hills had a slightly better participation.

I also concede that Kooyong had mostly a very strong field. But it did not have the prestige of Wembley.

Sedgman is not the only source for calling Wembley the top pro event or at least one of the tree top events. I have also read this in other sources including the big Collins encyclopedia.

The 14:14 balance of Rosewall and Hoad is not undocumented. Why should McCauley make a fake? But a few of your claims are undocumented (16:7 for Hoad; 13 wins of Hoad against Laver).
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote