Originally Posted by mental midget
it's hard to compare shots that were built to do different things. pete's mechanics compliment a faster, lower-bouncing surface, and his forehand was not designed for wars of attrition, because attrition wasn't his game.
novak's forehand is more consistent, can handle high balls much better, and allows him to hit inside out from an open stance, which is a big part of today's ground game. on the slicker courts of the not-too-distant past, though, pete's was a bigger weapon on a shot-to-shot basis.
Yeah, I think Pete's= bigger weapon. Djoker's = better overall.