View Single Post
Old 08-02-2012, 03:35 AM   #21
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,048

People always bring up Fed-Roddick first in these threads, but it's a bit unfair because Andy has a better record against Roger than quite a few Top 20 players, as horrid as it is. Though they haven't had the same career in terms of titles and big matches, look at Ferrer (no wins) and Soderling (who has only one win against Roger, despite often having been trumpeted as a danger player against Fed).

Also, despite the lopsided results, most of those Roddick slam finals were more competitive than a lot of Roger's non-Nadal finales. Wimbledon '04, U.S. Open '06 and (especially) Wimbledon '09 were great matches, with Roddick winning five sets total, unfortunately for him three couldn't come in one tournament.
Colin is offline   Reply With Quote