View Single Post
Old 08-06-2012, 10:21 AM   #34
smoothtennis
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis View Post
If I get bumped up to 4.0 next year (which I won't BTW) then my computer rating is actually 3.9, correct? The closer my opponents get to 4.40 (the number in which they will likely be bumped up to 4.5), they will be steadily better than I am.

It perfectly makes sense that the playoffs are the place where the competition is most fierce. You're playing people that are the best at being 4.0s, which means they are likely as close to 4.40 as possible.

Now, whether they are artificially tanking matches to keep their rating at 4.40, or if they got there "naturally" through practice and hard work, what difference does it make? They're still the best of what 4.0 tennis has to offer -- and that's what you should be expecting going into that match. If you yourself are not the best of what a 4.0 has to offer, then you probably won't make it that far in the playoffs.

It's the difference between really good, and really, really good. Frankly, I'd be happy to make it to the playoffs. I know I'll never get that chance.
Yeah, that's all fine and good, and our team plays straight up - and we certainly competed well and did better at sectionals than the team not to be named...LOL. However, we have guys getting the mid season bump of course. Now do we start doing the same BS so we can compete again, or do we let our guys go, and keep the top legit 4.0 talent watered down so the-team-that-shall-not-be-named can dominate once again. It's like Ground Hog Day I swear.

We can make it more fair, but we don't want to cheat either.
__________________
Babolat Aeropro weighted to 12.5oz - Prosupex Big Ace 51lbs.
smoothtennis is offline   Reply With Quote