View Single Post
Old 08-14-2012, 02:06 PM   #258
BauerAlmeida's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Argentina
Posts: 566

Originally Posted by timnz View Post
Djokovic has only been a leading player since 2007 - that is not quite 5 years. Edberg was a leading player from late 1985 (won Australian Open beating Lendl in semi's and Wilander in the final) to late 1994 (qualified for end of year championships) - 9 years. Becker was a leading player for 11 years (Wimbledon 1985 to Season end championship 1996), Wilander (from French Open 1982 to US Open 198 - more than 6 years. So he is coming up on Wilander but still a fair way behind the others.

He has 5 slams, Becker & Edberg are on 6, Wilander on 7. Becker won many season end finals and made the final match in many others too - so he has a great indoor CV. Djokovic is just won 1 - but it is fair to note that Edberg and Wilander aren't ahead of Djokovic there.

So I think he is still a tad behind them - but not much.
Not 5 years??

2012 (he'll end N4 in worst case scenario and probably 1 or 2).

That's 6 years as a TOP 3

How many years did SE, BB, and MW end that high? It's probably pretty close. Of course they have more years as a TOP 10 if they already finished their careers and Djokovic is only 25.
There's no Dark Side of the Moon really, matter of fact it's all dark.
BauerAlmeida is offline   Reply With Quote