Originally Posted by TeflonTom
cindy's argument appears to be that we should cease using ntrp as an easily-understood yardstick to facilitate communication and discussion, simply because she can't be arsed asking a follow-up question about how someone has arrived at their rating if that rating becomes important
this is an utterly bizarre thread, really
It's especially odd since Cindy has recently said that, though she's a 4.0, she plays mostly doubles and would have trouble beating a (female) 3.5 in singles. So apparently follow-up questions will be necessary no matter what...