View Single Post
Old 08-23-2012, 12:47 PM   #51
sureshs
Bionic Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 31,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhupaes View Post
I believe the objective is to model the collision in a very small timeframe that brackets the collision. How the racquet and ball achieved their speeds and direction would be immaterial for the purposes of this exercise. I believe this is what toly is trying to do, in order to simplify the model/calculations used, and I don't see anything wrong with it...
There is nothing wrong, but there is nothing useful either. If you remember all the collision problems you have solved, do you ever recall any mention of acceleration? No, it was always, u1, v1, u2, v2 etc. Why? Because no force was acting on those objects. When a racket head hits a ball, it is accelerating just prior to impact. So, conservation of momentum cannot be applied.
sureshs is online now   Reply With Quote