Originally Posted by Bartelby
If you have eyewitness testimony from ten riders plus others that he was doping, do you not think that such evidence on oath is not enough evidence?
There is some drug evidence, but if there's a murder then ballistics gets you so far and witnesses the rest of the distance barring confession.
Has any of that been made public? If not, why not? What is the exact nature of it? If not public, if may consist of Floyd Landis told me he saw x. Hardly credible.
It would be like me saying I have 10 people that will testify that Bartelby is a communist agitator but not coming forth with the actual names or the actual testimony. Not exactly fair to Bartelby.
Didn't a federal grand jury clear LA of this? Didn't the judge in that matter criticize the methods of the US body?
I don't know if he is guilty or not, but I'm not willing to hang the guy based on mere innuendo if that is all that they have against him.