Originally Posted by Bartelby
It won't be made public now simply because Armstrong chose not to defend himself against the charges because the public humiliation he would suffer would destroy him completely.
Instead he'll skulk off claiming victimisation.
So, you are assuming facts not in evidence. Seems to be a lot of that going around.
If someone finds a good synopsis that gives both sides of the story, please post a link. Seems most of the print on this matter has been along the lines of Let's Kill Lance Armstrong !!!
I allege that you were the second gunman in Dallas on 11/22/63. I have 10 people that will testify but I won't name them and you can't see their testimony. Prove me wrong.
For all I know, he is guilty as sin, but I would like him to get a fair hearing as opposed to a Kangaroo Court which is what it sounds like this thing is. No wonder he opted out.