Originally Posted by Fearsome Forehand
So, you are assuming facts not in evidence. Seems to be a lot of that going around.
If someone finds a good synopsis that gives both sides of the story, please post a link. Seems most of the print on this matter has been along the lines of Let's Kill Lance Armstrong !!!
I allege that you were the second gunman in Dallas on 11/22/63. I have 10 people that will testify but I won't name them and you can't see their testimony. Prove me wrong.
For all I know, he is guilty as sin, but I would like him to get a fair hearing as opposed to a Kangaroo Court which is what it sounds like this thing is.
I would also like to see both sides. The USADA can put this all to rest by simply producing a positive test result, and having it verified at an independent lab. If they were to do this, almost everyone would go along with Armstrong as a doper.
The fact that they have to resort to anything else seems strange to me.