View Single Post
Old 08-28-2012, 02:13 AM   #255
Sentinel
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Sentinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: standing alone on a Linux kernel
Posts: 25,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustard View Post
The UCI was backing Lance Armstrong in his former legal case against USADA, and rightfully so. What I see is a corrupt USADA, which has zero objective, physical evidence, and they have broken their own rules to pursue a witch hunt against Armstrong.

As far as Travis Tygart and co are concerned, Armstrong is guilty until proven innocent. How can anyone come to any other conclusion when they took Armstrong's decision to end any legal fight as an "admission of guilt"? They don't seem to realise that Armstrong doesn't have to prove anything.
What is the USADA's benefit in implicating LA ? Does it have to do with government grants as one other post suggested?
__________________
Sureshs being the voice of reason in this thread, the man who will bring world peace! Sureshs is the Gandhi of Talk Tennis. - maximagq
Sentinel is offline   Reply With Quote