Originally Posted by krosero
Federer still too young at the 2002 Wimbledon? Just one year away from his first Wimbledon title? Okay, if you want to do that, why on earth don't you say that about Borg and Connors at the 1973 Wimbledon? Connors was still one year away from his first Wimbledon, and had not yet won any majors. Borg had not yet won a tournament of any kind, and was three years away from his first Wimbledon.
Do you have any idea what it means to be consistent?
It is OK, Fed was not young but close to his peak just the same way Connors in 1973.I just forgot Federer was older than I thought he was but it is my bad.