Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
This is the same poster who argues Del Potro > Murray > Nadal as players. His sole purpose for existing is comedic relief, and if you find yourself agreeing with anything he says that is the only time to be worried. Of course even if he wasnt a pea brain he would be the last one qualified to speak on peak Courier given that he began following tennis in 2006 or later.
...that sounds like another one of the TW usual suspects--known for living exclusively through Wikipedia and youtube for his tennis "knowledge," which ends up here as lists that fail to support his arguments.