Originally Posted by Zarfot Z
Federer: 868–194 (81.73% WR)
Sampras: 762–222 (77.43% WR)
It is also blatantly obvious who is the easier player to beat. Sampras. By miles.
Do we not agree that Federer is the more accomplished and more complete player between the two?
I think you just agreed with me in the previous post that the records do not necessarily dictate how the two players would have faired head to head.
So what purpose does this winning percentage serve now? (not to mention the different eras and the fact that one is retired and the other still competing with Fed's percentage set to drop lower the longer he stays on tour)