Originally Posted by forzamilan90
Nadal is the best ever on clay...Has more majors on clay than Borg, more clay titles overall (a crapload of Masters titles at clay too), better winning percentage on the surface too, not to mention sheer strength of performance and aura on the surface.
Did Masters titles even exist back then?
Not to mention what the hell does "strength of performance and aura on the surface" even mean?
Are you talking about the fact that he hits 6000+ RPM FH winners while Borg couldn't?