Originally Posted by dangalak
Did Masters titles even exist back then?
Not to mention what the hell does "strength of performance and aura on the surface" even mean?
Are you talking about the fact that he hits 6000+ RPM FH winners while Borg couldn't?
the sheer fact that just about all tennis experts claim him to be the greatest on the surface, that he has more clay titles, winning percentage, and French Opens as a whole point to him being the greatest on the surface...Dude gets taken to one 5 setter in his French Open career....that's ridiculous, one loss too. Can't argue with stuff like that. Best clay courter ever.