View Single Post
Old 10-02-2012, 10:28 AM   #30
fed_rulz
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizo View Post
Although Federer's quality of play wasn't as good in 2007 as it was in 2004 or 2005, does his positive h2h against Nadal that year give it some bonus points? 2007 was the only year in he win he won more matches than he lost against Nadal, winning 3 out of their 5 encounters and beating him on 3 different surfaces.
this was possible because Federer lost at Rome early (to volandri). Goes to show how fallacious using Federer's h2h against Nadal is, especially when everyone knows (and won't admit) the heavy surface bias .
fed_rulz is offline   Reply With Quote