View Single Post
Old 10-02-2012, 10:44 AM   #31
Rock Strongo
Rock Strongo's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,513

Originally Posted by fed_rulz View Post
this was possible because Federer lost at Rome early (to volandri). Goes to show how fallacious using Federer's h2h against Nadal is, especially when everyone knows (and won't admit) the heavy surface bias .
Surface bias... If Fed is intelligent he should WO the next match against Nadal on clay and then proceed to kick his butt on other surfaces to bring the H2H back. I know, logic.

Being completely on topic now though I'll give it to McEnroe's 84 solely for the winning percentage. Had he won against Lendl it would've been 83-2, which would've been even more insane.
Uninstintively instinctive.
Rock Strongo is online now   Reply With Quote