Originally Posted by fed_rulz
this was possible because Federer lost at Rome early (to volandri). Goes to show how fallacious using Federer's h2h against Nadal is, especially when everyone knows (and won't admit) the heavy surface bias .
Surface bias... If Fed is intelligent he should WO the next match against Nadal on clay and then proceed to kick his butt on other surfaces to bring the H2H back. I know, logic.
Being completely on topic now though I'll give it to McEnroe's 84 solely for the winning percentage. Had he won against Lendl it would've been 83-2, which would've been even more insane.