Originally Posted by toly
Why have you never read messages from other parties carefully? The picture 2 has come from The New York Times video, see please post 135.
I didnít insert all frames in picture 1 in order to demonstrate the ballís path clearly. So, you cannot evaluate speed and acceleration of the racquet.
reveal your own, enough already useless words without any proof.
Ok, first, sorry I didn't find that Pic 2 that was on the screen for a couple of secs
during that vid, but to my defense, it was mostly blocked on my screen
by a big pause symbol for some reason.
On the bright side, that symbol was helpful once I located that frame. It was
very useful to show how incredibly inaccurate
that stroke path illustration was.
Watching the few secs prior where it had the swing, I could use the pause for
reference to the path and then see how way off the pic two lines were drawn in.
Its not even close. It's like they used something totally different, like say
a traditional perspective on extending the swing path down the target line.
So maybe you also need to look at things more carefully
and see there is the
evidence (not Proof of course) you request.
As to accel, why do you bring it up that you don't see it there, then come back
and say it is not set up to use for that purpose? Maybe that is why you don't