Thread: Miguel Cabrera!
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2012, 09:58 AM   #19
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,691
Default

Quote:
Not to mention he did it playing for a winning team, while Mike Trout played for an Angels team that never really got it going this year..
Angels had a better record than Tigers.

from http://sports.yahoo.com/news/10-degr...vp-season.html

Quote:
You know what matters? Mike Trout is hitting .321/.395/.557 with 30 home runs, 48 stolen bases in 52 attempts and plays center field better than anyone in the major leagues. He beats you with his bat, with his legs and with his glove. There is no exact way to measure whether that beats Cabrera's advantage with the bat. But Trout is close enough to Cabrera .325/.390/.601 with 43 home runs that anybody who values the havoc Trout wreaks on the basepaths (and not just stealing bases but taking extra ones) and the enormous advantage on defense (Gold Glove-caliber center fielder to below-average third baseman) surely would believe it not only makes up for it but also exceeds it.
Quote:
Oh, and the Angels are two games better than the Tigers in a far tougher division. Their run differential is +28 over Detroit's. Detroit gets to play 18 games against Kansas City, Minnesota and Cleveland. The Angels had Texas and Oakland for 19, plus more against Baltimore and Tampa Bay.
Quote:
We know runs batted in are teammate- and lineup-dependent statistics that Mike Trout, batting leadoff, is far less likely to get RBI opportunities than Miguel Cabrera, hitting third. And that's true: Cabrera leads the AL in at-bats with runners in scoring position, with 173. Trout has 106. And their numbers are awfully close, with Cabrera's OPS at .997 and Trout's at .939.
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote