View Single Post
Old 10-03-2012, 11:40 AM   #107
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,773

Originally Posted by Dan Lobb View Post
Actually, I think that the point we have been trying to make, despite some distractions, is that the Forest Hills Tournament of Champions, and the 1967 Wimbledon were not merely the EQUIVALENT of the established pro majors, but were significantly SUPERIOR to them. That, I believe, is the point.
A marked SUPERIORITY, which the established pro majors, for a number of reasons, could not hope to emulate.
Then, does it make any sense whatsoever NOT to include these super-tournaments among the pro majors? Obviously, the amswer must be "NO"!
Wembley and French pro were on the same level with Forest Hills and Wimbledon 1967. They had 16 great players in several years.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote