Originally Posted by treblings
seriously, why did the roehampton rocket not win a major after 69?
have you reached some sort of agreement/conclusion in this thread
Money.There is no other reason that explains that, a man that wins everythin g in 69, does not even reach one single final in 1970 (majors).Hey, even at the first Masters held in Tokyo 1970, he was clearly surpassed by Smith and nastase, who hadnīt peaked yet.
The only other guy that comes to mind in such a situation is Wilander.In his case, it is being completely burnt out.