Originally Posted by dangalak
Lemme guess: he lost and therefore it means nothing.
Some of the shots he pulls of here are like a savant being at work. Sure Djokovic and Nadal are BETTER players, but I don't think they have the kind of tennis gift that allows Murray to play the way that he does. They win because they do ordinary things better than Murray. Murray is more talented IMO because he does extraordinairy things better. Talent=/=being better.
He may not be in the Nalbandian/Federer class of talent but
Wow! A thread that actually acknowledges Murray has some talent! Is that a first for TTW?
I completely agree with you but I'm not sure if a video of a Federer-Hewitt match is the best way to illustrate this!