Originally Posted by pc1
Overall Lendl's record is superior to Kuerten's on clay. No doubt about that but I think Kuerten's best on clay is better than Lendl's. Just an opinion.
IŽd say that none of both would be favourite against the other on any given match on clay.Both could win it, depending on mood, mind state, court and wind conditions and some other untangibles.
Kuetren may look better since he specialised on clay, while Lendl, whose primary results were on clay, soon evolved into a hard courter and indoor courter sort of player, that makes his record on clay pale in comparison.