View Single Post
Old 10-04-2012, 07:34 PM   #68
BauerAlmeida
Semi-Pro
 
BauerAlmeida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Argentina
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth View Post
A committed Nalbandian is a different beast altogether. He could've beaten Federer on any surface and would've been much better than Roddick and Hewitt in general. Anyway, my "10 Gland Slam" case is if Federer weren't around.
Exactly. And yes, he wouldn't win 10 slams, but he would have won a few HC slams.

But if Fed wasn't around a focused Nalbandian/Safin would win most of the slams bar Roland Garros where Nadal would still dominate. They would even do better than Roddick/Hewitt at Wimbledon I think.
__________________
There's no Dark Side of the Moon really, matter of fact it's all dark.
BauerAlmeida is offline   Reply With Quote