View Single Post
Old 10-05-2012, 11:20 AM   #5
AnotherTennisProdigy's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 823

Originally Posted by Surecatch View Post
As is the case with almost all of these types of threads, your reasonings are quite misleading.

Calling clay Fed's "weakest" surface might technically be accurate, but he's been known for many years to be probably the best clay court player NOT named Nadal. If there was no Nadal, Federer would have won many many more clay titles. Being second to the best ever does not equal "weak." You might more accurately describe clay as Roger's "least totally awesome" surface.

Fed is one of the best ever on all three surfaces. Nadal is one of the best ever on one.
Lol, you beat me to it,
AnotherTennisProdigy is offline   Reply With Quote