Originally Posted by smoledman
But more importantly is Nadal has 4 grass/hard slams to only 1 clay slam for Federer.
4 > 1.
Given that 3 of the 4 slams are on hard or grass, wouldn't you expect this to be the case? Nice logic, no?
Give it up...Nads is not deserving of being in the discussion for best player of all time (an honor Fed has earned)...yet. He has been a tremendous career #2 man though, no?