View Single Post
Old 10-05-2012, 06:56 PM   #32
Talk Tennis Guru
TMF's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,237

The h2h between Fed and Nadal is pointless/meaningless because they are 5 years apart. We should compare player's h2h when both are at the same age, same prime/peak years.

Nadal should be comparing to Nole, Murray or Monfils. And Fed should be comparing to Roddick, Davy or Hewitt. Now let see who has a better winning % between Fed and Nadal.
Federer > Davydenko > Nadal > Federer
Nadalgaenger: "Djokovic is clearly better than Pete"
TMF is online now   Reply With Quote