View Single Post
Old 10-05-2012, 08:26 PM   #229
travlerajm
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ART ART View Post
@travlerajm:

and the MR^2= 392 ? it's far from 385

Maybe we need real specs like those from Novak and Almagro, in order to conclude something, but all in all it's allways a personal preference for each player, not some right or wrong numbers...

But, I apreciate a lot your efforts and theory, and there's allways some fire on it...

Cheers
ART ART,
As jstout pointed out, 392 is very close the the statistical apparent optimum. Also, notice that the sample size is lower at the high end of the player list than at the low end. And you may have noticed that my racquets are at 390, which I find to work best for me after years of experimentation.
__________________
BLX Blade 98. 13.69 oz., 12.55", 369 SW. 16x20 (outer mains skipped)
Pre-Stretched Ashaway Kevlar 16g/ZX Monogut Natural 16g, 66/46 lbs
travlerajm is offline   Reply With Quote