Originally Posted by smoledman
We all know how dominant they are on their best surfaces. Nadal on clay. Federer on hard/grass. But how well do they do on their weakest?
Nadal has 10 big hard/grass titles
Federer has 7 big clay titles
But more importantly is Nadal has 4 grass/hard slams to only 1 clay slam for Federer.
4 > 1.
OMG, this is
I'll play this game.
Let's consider Federer's 2 worst surfaces and Nadal's 2 worst surfaces.
Federer's : Clay and Grass (he has 9 HC Slams so it has to be his best surface going by the OP's logic)
Nadal's : Hard and Grass (Clay is obviously his best surface)
Number of Slams Federer has on his two "worst" surfaces : 1+7=8
Number of Slams Nadal has on his two "worst" surfaces : 2+2=4
8>4 ==> Federer>Nadal