Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
It is funny how Federer fans think Federer has the better forehand, better backhand, as good or better movement, yet he loses most of the baseline rallies in 85% of their matches (basically every match that wasnt indoors).
While I agree that it seems odd to say that Federer is better in all 3 categories (which I don't think he is), your reasoning is deeply flawed. Field VS match-up; relate your implications to parameters that do not just involve a singular opposition.
"If you're gonna be 5'8'', you better not be bald, fat and drunk whilst asking to be put in the 'all-time great sportsman' conversation." - Zoid