View Single Post
Old 10-06-2012, 08:09 AM   #148
The Dark Knight
The Dark Knight's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,340

Originally Posted by RF20Lennon View Post
So basically federer's wins don't count because nadal is a quitter ok.
No it's just some of his wins are not that great.

Nadal in less time and in less slams has actually done more than Federer . He has also beaten Federer In his own house and on every surface .

Federer is considered the greatest by some because he has 17 slams.

But some of those slams were really not that big of a deal.

The slams Nadal won were mainly against Federer himself . So I don't see how logically you can possibly say that Federer is the greatest player that ever lived when there is a player who is alive and dominates him.

Feds slams came mainly before Nadal or as Nadal was developing.

No way he can possibly win 17 slams with today's competition way in hell.
"Federer has to beat Nadal(if he wants) to be considered the greatest ever, certainly in my book." Pete Sampras
The Dark Knight is offline   Reply With Quote