Originally Posted by The Dark Knight
No it's just some of his wins are not that great.
Nadal in less time and in less slams has actually done more than Federer . He has also beaten Federer In his own house and on every surface .
Federer is considered the greatest by some because he has 17 slams.
But some of those slams were really not that big of a deal.
The slams Nadal won were mainly against Federer himself . So I don't see how logically you can possibly say that Federer is the greatest player that ever lived when there is a player who is alive and dominates him.
Feds slams came mainly before Nadal or as Nadal was developing.
No way he can possibly win 17 slams with today's competition .....no way in hell.
31 year-old Federer is world #1 "with today's competition."