Originally Posted by merlinpinpin
You should tray and learn:
- what "always" means
- what the results of tennis matches are
So, to recap, Nadal *has* always lost to Rosol, but Federer is far from having always lost to Nadal.
Nadal beat Federer in their very first meeting on a hardcourt . So yes Nadal has been beating Federer since their very first meeting ....for Nadals entire career he has always Dominated Federer. Yet somehow Federer is better than Nadal? How does that make sense?
"Federer has to beat Nadal(if he wants) to be considered the greatest ever, certainly in my book." Pete Sampras
Last edited by The Dark Knight; 10-06-2012 at 10:45 AM.