Originally Posted by The Dark Knight
Fortunate for Federer.
Nadal at 26 has missed 6 slams and am Olympics by the way.
Who has ever done more than that with such little time ?
That's why Nadal is the goat.
By the way those 6 slams Nadal missed ( correct me if I'm wrong please ).....
If I'm right about Nadal missing 6 slams then watch this:
17-6 = 11 or 11 +6= 17
Federer has never missed a slam and is 31 .....quite a bit more chances . Nadal has done more with far less chances....and beaten Federer.
To me Nadal is therefore greater.
So you assume Nadal would've won all 6 if he played them?
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio