Originally Posted by dangalak
Destroying implies a devastating performance. When has Nadal ever done this? Maybe once, in 2008.
Had you said "regularly beat Federer in slams", that would be closer to the truth.
Are you kidding? 4 times at the FO....it wasn't close....the AO didn't even go five sets.....and a 6-2 record on all slam surfaces is dominance......there is no way on earth anyone can logically say that Federer is better than Nadal.....it's just not true.
"Federer has to beat Nadal(if he wants) to be considered the greatest ever, certainly in my book." Pete Sampras