Originally Posted by dangalak
How can you make a ridiculous statements like that?
He WAS around in Wimbledon. Not to mention, Federer losing to Nadal isn't some sort of cosmological constant.
I mean if VERDASCO can win a match against Nadal, Federer can beat Nadal in slams as well.
No Federer cannot beat Nadal in slams .....not since 2007 and only on grass.
"Federer has to beat Nadal(if he wants) to be considered the greatest ever, certainly in my book." Pete Sampras