Originally Posted by The Dark Knight
Except that he can only win when Nadal ain't around.
These guys win 66-72% of their grand slam finals. Federer has put himself in a winning position more often than Nadal, which is why he has won more. Wanna win more? Then make more finals. Federer has 17 slams from 24 finals. Nadal has 11 from 16. This is pretty easy stuff to understand, yes?
You also stick to dogmatic absolutist logic like Player X simply CANNOT beat Player Y, etc. Sorry but that's not how reality works. Flat-earthers and YECs apply similar debate tactics.